So here is the topic: Could Pierce Brosnan feasibly come back to do a Bond after Craig leaves? Craig had nothing to do with the competition of winning the best James Bond when he was nobody, don't you think? But, by the way, do you know if James Bond married? It's not about Crag has been way more original at doing it and making it appear to be a fresher take. It's about whether or no Pierce Brosnan knows about current James Bond and that he wants to come back to do the role. Whether or no James Bond married, that's another joke to tell here
One says in a forum: Brosnan isn't the 'magic Bond' they would desperately want back. Craig seems to have gained more popularity than Brosnan. Unlike in '71, when they desperately needed Sean Connery back to restore what was wrongfully conceived the mistake of casting someone else, bringing back Brosnan after Craig's tenure wouldn't quite be trading up.
Brosnan's English is great, off course with that British accent. it doesn't sound like an Irishman who's been living in America too long. Well, who says that? Who also did leave Brosnan a lot of room to do what hasn't been done before? That's not too important. If Brosnan wants to get back to do a Bond, he's to old to jump on top of the train--I mean the one with a lot of people as you can see in India.
Do you believe Craig is a much better actor and would have insisted right from the beginning? What does it mean? Pierce Brosnan, on a certain amount of creative control, can be a tough hero, not merely James Bond, that would have made a much bigger difference. Don't you think this is great? Or confusing?
Well, to make sure whether Pierce Brosnan would feasibly come back to do a Bond after Craig leaves? you must not stay here for long as this blog has no picture of his telling so.
